“They argue for the purposes of dual militancy we are a coalition, but to annul my election on the board of directors we are a single party”the senator argued in discontent through her social networks.
In this message, Pizarro refers to the fact that, when he ran for the board of directors of this entity, He did it as a member of the MAIS party. However, as the Council of State argues, on different occasions the politician is recognized as a member of the Historical Pact coalition.
Read also: The CNE requests detailed information about money donated to Petro’s campaign
Furthermore, through the same message, he assured that the decision of the Council of State It would be directly affecting minorities, punishing them once they reach the board of directors.
On the other hand, the policy of the historic pact assured that this decision would be hindering the political exercise and would be making your criteria inequitable at the time of decision making.
This shows that the inequitable evaluation criterion that affects political minorities would be being applied, hindering the political exercise of the coalitions in electoral matters and punishing minorities when they reach the board of directors.
It should be noted that Pizarro, in addition to being a Senator of the Republic, and until yesterday vice president of the same entity, also plays an important role as government delegate to the peace talks being carried out with the ELN guerrilla.