Home » The past and present of Hong Kong’s “Article 23”: Five nodes in the contest between public opinion and the authorities over the past thirty years – BBC News Chinese

The past and present of Hong Kong’s “Article 23”: Five nodes in the contest between public opinion and the authorities over the past thirty years – BBC News Chinese

by admin
The past and present of Hong Kong’s “Article 23”: Five nodes in the contest between public opinion and the authorities over the past thirty years – BBC News Chinese

**Hong Kong Implements Article 23 Legislation Under National Security Law**

On March 23, 2024, Hong Kong officially gazetted and implemented the “Maintenance of National Security Ordinance,” commonly known as “Article 23.” This move marks a significant moment in the region’s history, as Chief Executive Li Jiachao described it as fulfilling Hong Kong’s constitutional responsibilities and historical mission after waiting for 26 years, eight months, and 19 days.

The legislative process for the “Article 23” bill was a swift one, with the Hong Kong government receiving overwhelming support during the brief one-month pre-public consultation period. According to official sources, 98.6% of the opinions received were in favor of the legislation, setting the stage for a smooth passage in the Legislative Council composed of “patriots.”

The history of “Article 23” legislation dates back to the 1980s, with the provisions evolving over the years to include crimes related to treason, secession, incitement of rebellion, subversion, and more. This evolution has been influenced by various political events, including the “June 4th” incident in 1989, the 2003 demonstration involving 500,000 people, and the “Umbrella Movement” in 2014.

With the implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong and the passing of the Article 23 legislation, the region has entered a new era of governance under the “One Country, Two Systems 2.0” framework. Political scientists analyze that this process serves as a form of “re-education” for Hong Kong people, leading to societal changes that may prevent a return to true peace.

While the authorities emphasize the importance of national security and maintaining stability, critics argue that the new laws may undermine civil liberties and judicial independence in Hong Kong. The legislation grants increased powers to law enforcement agencies and strengthens measures to combat espionage and infiltration activities.

See also  Lääne Elu newspaper on Thursday, August 3

As Hong Kong adjusts to this new political landscape, the debate over the implementation of Article 23 and its implications for democracy and freedom of expression continues. The government’s focus now shifts to economic growth and security, with promises of a prosperous future for the region under the new legal framework.

The passage of Article 23 legislation marks a significant milestone in Hong Kong’s history, with implications for its future trajectory and the rights and freedoms of its residents. As the region adjusts to these changes, the debate over national security and civil liberties is likely to remain at the forefront of public discourse.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy