SALERNO – Marco Mezzaroma reads the rules of ordinary and sports justice, also with a degree in law. And at the Palazzo del calcio he reproaches more than something about the forced sale of Salernitana. “What has actually changed since a few hours ago? Really nothing, it seems to me ». The first thought of the co patron, with his brother-in-law Claudio Lotito, of the newly promoted team to Serie A. Mezzaroma, in fact, puts his foot down after yesterday’s Federal Council. And not only because the FIGC has absolutely decided to sell the club by 25 June “In order to guarantee the regularity of the championship, according to the provisions of art. 7 (paragraph 8) of the Federal Statute and by art. 16 bis (paragraphs 1 and 2) of the Noif “.
So Salernitana is destined to change ownership?
Let’s see what happens, I wouldn’t take anything for granted. It certainly seems to me that the FIGC has not decided anything sensational compared to what was already known.
In short, the die is not cast?
I believe that the new article 16 bis of the Noif approved by the Federal Council on April 26 has some very evident traits of unconstitutionality.
Explain.
I believe that from a legal point of view it is unexceptionable as the provisions of federal regulations do not protect the right to property. And since I personally hold fifty percent of the shares of Salernitana, I believe that I cannot be prevented from continuing to remain in the world of football because I have to sell without being able to buy another club while my brother-in-law Lotito is Lazio’s reference point.
Mezzaroma, therefore, disputes the content of the federal rule on timeshare.
The right to do business provided for by the Constitution is denied if, in our case, the owner of a football club cannot continue to own it in the event of promotion from Serie D to C2 and if he is at the helm of another company in the professionals. Prohibition extended also to those with family ties.
THE COMPLETE ARTICLE IN THE NEWSPAPER ON THE NEWSSTAND TODAY