[Epoch Times July 07, 2021]Hello, everyone, it is 6:30 pm on July 6th, U.S. Eastern time, and July 7th, Beijing time. Welcome to watch current affairs and chat every day. I’m Sydney (Wang Yuhe); I’m Qin Peng.
Today’s focus: 500 mainland students studying in the United States were denied visas. The CCP was annoyed and scolded Biden for saying one thing and doing one thing; Australia was determined to protect Taiwan and called on the United States to publicly counterattack the CCP for revenge.
Sydney: The new U.S. regulations may deny visas for 3,000-5,000 Chinese students. The CCP is outraged into public protests. Biden said one thing and one thing. The attitude of mainland netizens is polarized, and cynicism is the majority. However, it has only been a few days after the 100th anniversary of the party. What happened? Why do the CCP authorities and so many students want to study in the United States crying and crying? Among the reasons for not letting go, two reasons are the most important.
Qin Peng: Following Japanese Deputy Prime Minister Aso’s public statement of advancing and retreating with Taiwan, Australian officials have also continuously publicly stated that they will protect Taiwan and called on the United States to attack the CCP militaryly when the CCP retaliates against Australia. Is this coincidence or cooperation, why should Australia and Japan jointly force the United States?
Sydney: We will talk about these two topics today. Friends who like our program, welcome to like, subscribe, and leave a message to interact with us.
A large number of students studying in the U.S. are rejected by the CCP, annoyed by the CCP, scolding Trump and Biden
Sydney: Today, the refusal of Chinese students’ visas by the U.S. became popular on the Internet. First, the party media “China Daily” reported that more than 500 Chinese science and engineering graduates and doctoral students were denied visas, and then the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China made the decision. Negotiations and protests triggered an upsurge of reposting and discussion by the media and Internet users, turning them into a phenomenon-level news event that has attracted much attention.
Qin Peng: The reason that the US embassy and consulate refused to sign these students was that they did not comply with Presidential Decree No. 10043 signed during the Trump administration. The presidential decree was signed by former U.S. President Trump on May 29, 2020, prohibiting Chinese students with ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from obtaining visas to enter the United States.
Sydney: Most of the more than 500 people who were refused visas have to go to the United States to study electrical and electronic engineering, computers, machinery, chemistry, materials science, biomedicine and other majors. The U.S. universities to be studied include some of the top universities in the U.S., including Harvard, Yale, University of California, Berkeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Johns Hopkins University, etc. Most students apply for visas after the new US government came to power. About a quarter of the students received US scholarships.
Qin Peng: Of course, these more than 500 people may have just written to the CCP’s embassy in the United States for help, and there are many others who did not apply or were rejected without making a statement. According to statistics from American academic institutions, this order affects about 3,000-5,000 Chinese graduate students in science and engineering and those who are already in the United States.
Sydney: In response to this incident, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China Zhao Lijian said that China has expressed serious concerns about this and has made solemn representations to the US. He said that the US approach is “continuing the legacy of the Trump administration.” He also talked about three contradictions, saying that “to run counter to the United States‘ self-advertised concept of openness and freedom, run counter to the trend of the times for international talent exchanges, run counter to the common aspiration of the people of China and the United States for friendly exchanges, and go backwards in history.” .
Qin Peng: I noticed that the patriotism and patriotism in the comment area on Weibo is very different from the patriotic sentiment that was instigated on 7.1 a few days ago. Some people accused the United States of killing 1,000 people and hurting 800 people, and some overseas students were affected and complained about it. , I look forward to the early lifting of the ban, but most mainland Chinese netizens ridiculed this, and obviously took this incident as an opportunity to vent their dissatisfaction with the authorities. Let’s take a look at some comments.
The Weibo that I see now has more than 4,300 reposts, nearly 200,000 comments, and 400,000 likes. According to my understanding of Weibo, there may be tens of millions of people watched.
Sydney: Tribulus Ridge: “They hope to only learn their’literature and history’, with a few more Hu Shizhi, short, big and tight, and not let us touch technology.”
Qin Peng: The short big tight refers to Gao Xiaosong, who is also a news figure recently.
Sydney: I’m a small class flower: “The same countermeasures and refused to sign a student from Peking University and Tsinghua University.”
Qin Peng: This seems to be a booze, because most of the American students at Peking University and Tsinghua University are the children of Chinese Americans.
Sydney: Soho Yi Xiao: “This is really hurting the enemy’s self-defeating. The fact that China’s top science and engineering college students basically never return to the United States is actually training talents for the United States…”
Qin Peng: Netizen Xun Xiaoni is obviously feeling that this policy has caused many international students to interrupt their studies and dare not return to their country or cannot go back. He said: “There have been too many heartbreaking stories.[伤心]And not to mention anything else, now there is no degree from an overseas top school, and there are no better teaching posts in domestic schools, so what to talk about for national research. “
Another netizen, Nalan Rongzheng, seems to be a direct victim. “Applied in 19 years and got an offer in the United States in 20 years. Then, because of Trump’s New Deal, he had to continue to postpone it until now.”
Sydney: Enter TSIN: “A bit ambitious, don’t go if others don’t let you go, it’s someone else’s house. I want to go to a capitalist country with all my heart, what’s so good?”
The fox sealed in the deep sea: “People have the right to refuse. The technology is theirs, so everyone must be taught.”
Qin Peng: Most of these nearly 20,000 comments seem to violate the main theme of the Chinese Communist Party. Therefore, a netizen named bartenderrrrrshaw said: “Is the Qing Dynasty dead in the comment area? Although the international situation is not good, admit that the US is now Is it difficult to still be the world‘s academic No. 1? What’s more, the rejections are all 985 undergraduate students in China, just for better academic development, and they will come back in the future.”
I am also very happy to see the comments under the Southern Metropolis Daily.
The most direct opposition to the CCP was the one posted by China Daily on Zhao Lijian’s protest video.
Sydney: Some Chinese netizens said, “If you don’t let you go, why don’t you want to go?” Others said, “Don’t you think you are contradictory? They also said that they would not come back from studying abroad, and that the United States had blocked them. Global elites. Now they refuse to enter and condemn others! Haven’t we refused to sign others???”
Qin Peng: There are still people who want to get iron. I think there are people calling to North Korea. Obviously, these are all driven by the false propaganda of the CCP authorities. To vent the dissatisfaction of the CCP.
Sydney: This is indeed a phenomenon that seems very contradictory to the outside world. On the one hand, we have seen that the Chinese Communist Party media and some small pinks are inciting hatred against the United States. On the other hand, in fact, most Chinese people still hope to study in the United States. The Chinese people lined up in front of the American embassy in China have also been in an endless stream.
What’s more interesting is that the video of Li Yi, the Chinese Communist nationalist who advocated the reunification of Taiwan two days ago, also said that all units in China are under the control of the underworld, and that all levels of the Chinese Communist system are ruining talents. If you want to continue your studies, you must go abroad and the United States is the first choice. Qin Peng, what do you think of these contradictions?
Qin Peng: Actually, I came from the mainland, so I understand the mentality of mainlanders. They actually have a contradictory and divisive mindset towards the United States. If they are given the opportunity to study in the United States and given the US green card, they will definitely be happily killed. Unnecessarily. Because we know that the United States is good, education is good, air is good, mountains and rivers are good, food is safe, public security is good, civilized, old-aged, and people live with dignity and status, and so on. Regardless of how the authorities publicize that the United States is not good and the epidemic is serious, most people know who is good and who is not.
However, in any case, there will still be some people who will sing praises for the party even when they arrive in the United States. For example, in the past few days, we have seen some people in the United States and some parts of the world. spontaneous. Of course, there are still some people like Li Yi and Sima Nan, who hold Communist Party money and American green cards or passports, but they curse the United States and lie on behalf of the Communist Party.
Sydney: Yes. Why do you think the Chinese Communist Party officially promotes hatred of the United States? Not only do so many people still want to study in the United States, but the Chinese Communist Party officials are also crying and crying for students to study in the United States? Even Zhao Lijian mentioned the slogans of friendly exchanges and friendship between the people of China and the United States that have not been heard in recent years.
Qin Peng: The most Chinese students study in the United States, especially in science and engineering. Of course, the main reason is that it is the forefront of innovation, with the best schools and scientific research atmosphere.
For the CCP and many Chinese students, there are two more reasons:
First, the CCP has been propagating that it is a heroic act to study science and technology in the West and bring cutting-edge technology back to serve the country. The most famous in history is Qian Xuesen, known as the “father of Chinese missiles.” The contribution of technology was officially designated as a “first-class hero model” by the Chinese Communist Party. For decades, there have been many celebrities in the mainland science and technology circles. After returning from studying abroad, they assisted the mainland in developing various technologies including atomic bombs, hydrogen bombs, and other technologies. They have also become role models for many mainland youths interested in scientific research.
Second, the United States still has a commercial atmosphere that can be transformed very well. This is very different from the mainland’s ivory tower-style teaching and scientific research. In recent years, there has been a widely publicized representative of overseas students in China called Liu Ruopeng. Officially, he has invented the invisibility cloak. This is actually a typical example of the CCP’s hope that the stealing technology will work for the CCP.
Sydney: I know this person. He is now a representative of the Second Session of the Communist Party of China and a billionaire. His technology was stolen from the United States, and many people also said that it was this man who caused the United States to expel a large number of Chinese students.
He graduated from Duke University in 2009 with a master’s degree and a doctorate degree, and led the team to successfully develop the “invisibility cloak.” Liu Ruopeng became famous in one fell swoop and was hailed as “the pioneer of Chinese metamaterials.” However, his alma mater Duke University published an article in the school newspaper “The breaking latest news” questioning him as an “academic spy.” Because a Dr. Smith from Duke University is an expert on metamaterials.
US reports said that Liu Ruopeng claimed to be a fan of Dr. Smith in 2006, so he decided to apply to Duke University and study with Dr. Smith. Liu Ruopeng worked in Smith’s laboratory for 3 to 6 months and participated in several projects including the invisibility cloak.
It is said that one day Liu Ruopeng took advantage of Dr. Smith’s absence and illegally photographed the equipment of the invisible cloak in the laboratory. After leaving the United States, he copied a device for research and development in China. Smith thought it was theft. Because stealth technology is very important in the military, Smith’s team also received financial support from the US Pentagon. As a result, the FBI officially launched an investigation of Liu Ruopeng in 2010.
The investigation is still inconclusive, but with this technology, Liu Ruopeng has become a super-rich in China. Baidu Encyclopedia shows that Liu Ruopeng is ranked 24th with 4.1 billion yuan in the “2019 Hurun Post-80s Rich List”.
Qin Peng: Yes. Therefore, for the CCP, the reason for crying and crying to study in the United States is to acquire the best technology, which is also the easiest technology to commercialize.
Sydney: Yes. I see netizens are saying that the students funded by the China Scholarship Council are basically rejected, and the students with the National Defense Seventh background are also rejected: “The rejected is the National Defense Seventh and Beijing Post. Almost all majors go to masters or stem majors. Doctoral applicants (including some liberal arts students) and all CSC co-training applicants, so far more than 500 people, it is also very unreasonable!”
The foreign students with the background of the Seven National Defense Scholars are seven colleges and universities directly related to the military. Including Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and Nanjing University of Science and Technology. Now 4 of these 7 universities have been listed as export control entities by the US Department of Commerce List.
Qin Peng: We know that the Australian think tank has a special report on how the Chinese Communist military will subsidize them to study in major western developed countries, steal secrets, and develop the Chinese military technology. The Chinese Communist Party also had a resounding slogan in China before, called “Collecting Flowers in Foreign Countries”. “Chinese brewing honey” means to gather the essence to benefit the Chinese Communist regime.
Sydney: For the students of the National Defense Seventh Sons, the reason for the refusal this time is the ban No. 10043 issued by Trump last year. At that time, it was mainly aimed at 3,000 Chinese graduate students studying in the United States. Not only did they have to refuse visas, but they also had to expel them. Outbound. The reason is that these Chinese graduate students are connected with the “Chinese military” and will bring national security risks to the United States. This is understandable.
However, why is this CSC, also known as the “China Scholarship Council” (China Scholarship Council) funded international student, also refused to apply?
Qin Peng: I specifically checked today that the China Scholarship Council mainly selects Chinese students or scholars and provides fund support. This scholarship is divided into two categories, one is to study abroad for a degree, and the other is joint training. Joint training is equivalent to studying in a foreign university for a period of time, then returning to China to apply for a degree after graduation. Therefore, this is also known as the Chinese Communist State Scholarship for Study Abroad.
The conditions for this application are full-time staff or students in Chinese universities, enterprises, institutions, administrative agencies, and scientific research institutions, who are at least 18 years old. When applying for CSC, there must be a guarantee unit, and the application cannot be submitted without a guarantee unit. College students or official staff of state-owned enterprises have a relatively high probability of successful application.
For these students, because there are requirements to return to the country, the CCP has a strict political review, so it is actually very strict. We can look at the introduction of the CCP embassy in the United States. It can be seen that there must be constant political review, including:
1. Government selection (political review); 2. Centralized training in Shanghai and other places (what content is required to love the party and the country?); 3. Regularly report learning status on the information platform (political review of overseas study? Accept supervision), otherwise it will affect the scholarship Issuance; 4. Application for eligibility to return to China (final political review?).
Sydney: Always subject to the party’s training and supervision, ideological review, no wonder the United States directly rejected it.
I saw that a few days ago, some mainland Chinese netizens organized a protest to go to the US Embassy in China with the slogan “We are Chinese, not (CCP) spies.”
Qin Peng: Yes. The United States used CCP and China when separating the CCP from China, and the CCP is not China. The CCP launched a major online publicity campaign to first turn China into Chinese, then translate Chinese into Chinese, and then translate it into Chinese. If the CCP is not Chinese, and then the CCP is not Chinese, creating logical chaos to attack the United States. I feel that no matter if you are an overseas student in China or the United States, you must not get involved in these political activities, otherwise it may affect your study abroad in the future.
We have said before that no matter who is the president of the United States, it is no longer possible to go back to the past in terms of studying abroad.
Sydney: Well, I hope that those international students who go abroad will also use this opportunity to truly understand a free and democratic society.
Australia and Japan one after another push the palace to force the United States?
Sydney: Recently, Australia and Japan have both stood up to stand up for Taiwan, against the CCP, and they also forced the United States together.
Deputy Prime Minister of Japan: The United States and Japan must defend Taiwan together
Let’s take a look. First of all, on the Japanese side, on the 5th, Japanese Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Taro Aso stated in a speech that if the CCP invades and attacks Taiwan, “the United States and Japan must jointly defend Taiwan.”
He stated that if the CCP infringes on Taiwan, the Japanese government will consider this to be a “survival crisis” stipulated by the relevant security laws.
Qin Peng: The “survival crisis” means that when other countries closely related to Japan are attacked by force and form a dangerous state such as “threatening the survival of the Japanese nation”, the Japanese Self-Defense Forces can exercise limited “collective self-defense rights.” To translate it more bluntly, that is to say, Japan is saying publicly that this is a threat to Japan’s security and it will be forced to go to war.
Sydney: Among them, the interesting thing is that Japan just pulled the United States together, saying not that Japan must defend Taiwan, but that “the United States and Japan must defend Taiwan together.”
Qin Peng: Yes. Japan’s strategy for the CCP is now becoming clearer and clearer, and it will never compromise on the Taiwan issue, that is, if the CCP strikes Taiwan, Japan will not sit idly by.
Sydney: The CCP is definitely dissatisfied with Japan’s tendency to become tougher towards the CCP. The CCP’s media “Global Network” reported on the 5th that Japan’s relatively balanced foreign policy between China and the United States has recently undergone a shift. The hawks have direct contact.” The global network named the “six eagles”, including the current Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, Minister of Defense Nobuo Kishi, Deputy Minister of Defense Yasuhide Nakayama, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Taro Aso, and Chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party’s Taxation Survey. Kam Liming and former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
For example, in the report, in April this year, Japan and the United States mentioned Taiwan for the first time in a joint statement at the summit of heads of state after half a century. Said that Japan seems to be closely following the United States, showing more and more clearly its toughness towards the CCP.
Qin Peng: The transformation of Japan? In fact, I think that part of the reason is that Japan is pulling the United States, and then together. Now it is to continue to promote.
Sydney: Why does Japan have such a tough attitude now?
Qin Peng: National security, Japanese East Asian culture, and understanding of the CCP. Knowing that the CCP has now become addicted to expansion and expansion.
Another reason is that there is no turning back arrow in the bow. Now that it has embarked on the road of confrontation, Japan knows that if you retreat, you will die and if you advance, you will live.
Prime Minister of Australia: Fulfill the agreement to support the United States and allies in the Indo-Pacific region
Sydney: Then we saw what is happening in Australia. Former Australian Deputy Minister of Defence Paul Dibb wrote an article today (6th) in response to the threat of Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of the CCP’s official media “Global Times”. This matter is also related to Taiwan, and it is also pulling the United States together. But there is a context to this matter.
The origin was on May 6, when Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison was interviewed on the same day. He was asked whether Australia would support Taiwan if China invaded Taiwan by force. Morrison replied: “We (Australia) have been performing Support the agreement between the United States and its allies in the Indo-Pacific region.”
The next day, on May 7, Hu Xijin immediately published an article criticizing Australia on Weibo and published the full text in English on the English version of Huanshi. He stated that if Australia supports the United States in defending Taiwan, China will impose “retaliatory punishments” on Australia, including “long-range strikes on Australia (Continent) domestic military installations and related key installations.”
He wrote: “China’s production capacity is very strong, including the additional production of some long-range missiles equipped with conventional warheads that are used to target Australian military targets when the situation is highly tense.”
Today, July 6, the former Deputy Secretary of Defense Dieb wrote an article titled “US must be clear: hit an ally and we hit back” (US must be clear: hit an ally and we hit back). The United States must declare to China , Once the allies are attacked, the United States will fight back.
In assisting in the defense of Taiwan, Australia is also pulling the United States together.
Qin Peng: Dibu pointed out that Hu Xijin’s words of “long-range strikes against Australia (Continent) local military installations and related key installations” can be interpreted as “Pine Gap” (Pine Gap) in the desert of Australia’s Northern Territory. The US-Australia Joint Intelligence Station was listed as the target of attack.
Dieb emphasized that China’s inclusion of “relaxation” as its target of attack means that China will paralyze the United States‘ ability to detect nuclear missiles, thereby paving the way for China to escalate its nuclear war.
Dieb mentioned that during the Cold War from 1970 to 1980, the Soviet Union also understood that if the Soviet Union were to attack military installations such as Songkou, Nurrungar in South Australia and North West Gape, the United States would think The Soviet Union is about to break out of a nuclear war.
Dibu pointed out that China seems to have no intention of engaging in dialogue with other countries on nuclear weapons; and China, which has more than 200 “strategic nuclear warheads” (strategic nuclear warheads), is striving to double the number of nuclear weapons in the short term. He believes that this shows that the purpose of China’s holding of nuclear weapons is not just to deter and prevent attacks by other countries.
Dibu reminded that China still has 2,000 theater missiles capable of targeting most of the Indo-Pacific region, most of which are equipped with nuclear warheads; some of them are equipped with conventional warheads, which are sufficient to target northern Australia. .
Sydney: Dieb also emphasized that Australia does not have long-range missiles; when China attacks Australia, it is difficult for Australia to fight back. Therefore, he believes that in the face of China’s missile threat, Australia must obtain a clear statement from the United States, and the United States must declare to China that once allies are attacked, the United States will immediately counterattack the Chinese leaders.
Dieb suggested that Australia should establish a missile defense system and upgrade Australia’s air defense destroyers to have missile defense capabilities as soon as possible.
In addition, Dibu published an article through the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) as early as February 2019, arguing that once China’s armed force invades Taiwan and the United States rushes to aid Taiwan, it will be based on the “ANZUS Defence Convention” (ANZUS). Treaty), Australia has an obligation to support the United States in defending Taiwan.
Qin Peng: At the end of March this year, Australian Prime Minister Morrison announced that he would spend 1 billion Australian dollars to quickly promote the creation of guided weapons companies in Australia, build a new military manufacturing industry, and fight the CCP.
In response to the deteriorating strategic environment, the Australian government is expected to spend 100 billion yuan to purchase missiles and guided weapons in the next 20 years. The latest defense documents of the United States also mentioned that enhancing missile capabilities is the key to countering China’s (CCP) military superiority in the Pacific region.
According to the “Australian” report, at a time when Australia-China tensions are increasing, the Morrison government’s move has two main strategic goals. It strengthened the US-Australia military alliance, consolidated the closest advanced technology sharing relationship and the integration of the military supply chain.
Sydney: Australia and the CCP are in a state of tension. On April 25, Australian Defence Minister Peter Dutton stated that “conflicts cannot be ruled out”. The Secretary of the Interior, Michael Pezzullo (Michael Pezzullo) even mentioned that “the drum of war was sounded.”
Qin Peng: Since Australia publicly requested to investigate the source of the new crown virus in April 2020, relations between the two countries have deteriorated. The CCP imposed retaliatory tariffs on Australia, and the ambassador to Australia also listed the so-called “14 crimes” against Australia.
Sydney: In addition to accusing Australia of attacking China in the source of the virus, the “14 counts” also include issues in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Qin Peng: However, the CCP’s wolf war behavior has seriously damaged its image in Australia.
The more moderate voices within Australia’s political parties have declined, while the hawks have risen. The hawkish Senator James Patterson pointed out that no government, whether it is the Labor Party or the Liberal Party, can succumb to any of the 14 articles proposed by China. He also said that “these themes are at the core of our identity as a free democracy.”
Sydney: But economically, Australia originally relied heavily on China. From 1992 to 2020, China continued to ensure its 28 consecutive years of growth. In 2019, it became the second largest country in the world to import a large amount of minerals and agricultural products, and more than one-third of Australia’s products were exported to China.
Now, in addition to wine, shellfish exports and lobster are also being swept out of the Chinese market.
Qin Peng: Australia filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization on June 19 that China imposed punitive tariffs on its wine, and similar procedures have been initiated and include protests against China’s tariffs on its barley exports.
However, on the economic front, the response to China’s measures has begun to bear fruit. Compared with 2019, Australia’s total exports to China in 2020 have fallen by only 2%, and the soaring iron ore prices have made up for Australia’s losses.
Sydney: Yes, we now see that Australia and Japan are coercing the United States. Is this a coincidence or a cooperation?
Qin Peng: I think it is a high degree of unanimity and coordination between the people and the government. Moreover, the appearance is a retired official, but it is actually the attitude of the government. This is a public statement, and it is forcing the United States to make a statement. From vague strategy to clear strategy.
Sydney: On June 30, the United States and Taiwan restarted the Taiwan-US Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA), which was suspended for nearly five years. The two sides touched on a wide range of topics such as medical, biotechnology, and supply chain. Scholars said that the talks have laid the foundation for the US and Taiwan to sign a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). If the US and Taiwan sign a bilateral trade agreement or a free trade agreement (FTA), Japan, Europe and Canada may also negotiate with Taiwan.
The British “Financial Times” reported that “Washington and Taipei are seeking to deepen economic relations amid friction with China.”
Reuters reported that in the face of pressure from Beijing, the Biden administration “has taken action to reaffirm its commitment to Taiwan, an island of democratic governance.”
Qin Peng: Taiwan’s negotiations with other countries to sign bilateral free trade agreements are often obstructed by China due to their international status or sovereignty, and countries also dare not touch them due to sensitive issues. However, in the Taiwan-US TIFA negotiations, the US has tended to take the initiative and may be willing to reach long-term negotiations with Taiwan.
President Biden has adopted an alliance strategy with foreign countries and actively negotiated with G7, NATO, Japan, Australia and India in the Asia-Pacific region. In particular, mainland China is Taiwan’s largest export market and source of imports, and it is naturally an indispensable part of the strategy.
The United States has also repeatedly stated that it attaches importance to the security of the Taiwan Strait and peace in the Indo-Pacific region. On June 6, three U.S. senators landed in Taiwan on a clearly marked U.S. Air Force transport plane.
Sydney: From the recent international situation, we can see that due to the CCP’s concealment of the epidemic, war wolf diplomacy, and the persecution of human rights in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and faith groups, countries led by the United States have formed a siege network against the CCP. .
Production Team of “Qin Peng Live”
Editor in charge: Li Hao #
.