Home » Towards the Final Round of the Presidential Election Dispute Hearing at the Constitutional Court

Towards the Final Round of the Presidential Election Dispute Hearing at the Constitutional Court

by admin
Towards the Final Round of the Presidential Election Dispute Hearing at the Constitutional Court

Jakarta

Hearing of applications for disputes over general election results (PHPU) president and vice president 2024 at the Constitutional Court (MK) towards the final round. All parties have made all preparations to await the decision or decision hearing.

As is known, the Constitutional Court (MK) has decided that the pronouncement of the decision or decree on the general election results dispute (PHPU) is scheduled for Monday, April 22 2024.

The complete stages of PHPU are contained in Constitutional Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 concerning Stages, Activities and Schedules for Handling Cases of Disputes over the Results of General Elections for Members of the People’s Representative Council, Regional Representative Council, Regional People’s Representative Council, as well as General Elections for President and Vice President.

ADVERTISEMENT

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar (AMIN) Team, the Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud Md Team, the KPU and Bawaslu have also prepared to wait for the final round.

KPU Will Comply with the Rules

The General Election Commission (KPU) believes that the Constitutional Court (MK) will reject the presidential election dispute request in accordance with the legal framework. The KPU ensures that the implementation of the 2024 presidential election is in accordance with what is regulated by the Election Law.

“I am very confident that the Constitutional Court will decide on the two PHPU applications for the presidential election within the legal framework contained in Article 473 paragraph (3) of Law No. 7 of 2017,” said Head of the Technical Division of the Indonesian KPU Idham Holik to journalists, Tuesday (16/4/2024 ).

See also  Viral 'Different Data' Votes in KPU Sirekap, Bawaslu: Not Determinant of Recapitulation

Idham said that the KPU would provide additional evidence to the MK. Idham assessed that the applicant’s petition did not match the facts.

“The additional evidence aims to prove that what the applicants are asking for is not in accordance with the facts of the process of voting, counting and recapitulating the vote results for presidential election participants,” he said.

Idham hopes that the Constitutional Court can reject the petitioners’ petition. According to him, the holding of the presidential election was in accordance with the rules.

“With the addition of this evidence, the KPU confirms its request that the MK Panel of Judges can reject the petitioners’ application,” he said.

So, what are the others preparing? Read the next page.

See also Video: Getting to know the Amicus Curiae that Megawati submitted to the Constitutional Court

[Gambas:Video 20detik]

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy