One of the suspects went to the carabinieri to see clearly: the head physician acquitted, the accusation of aiding and abetting should also fall
BELLUNO. Culpable epidemic of Covid-19 at San Martino. One of the suspects, in the case of Dr. Roberto Bianchini, presented a complaint – complaint to the police of the Belluno Command. It is not known whether this act is postponing the closure of investigations, which have long since come to an end. Certainly Antonella Fabbri, who is being investigated for aiding and abetting the head of Otolaryngology and false ideology, has denounced something that does not fit in the investigations that the Prosecutor has delegated to Finance. It is his right to defend himself from what he believes to have been an error that would later end up in the proceedings. It could be the story of the minutes of the Disciplinary Commission, which had to decide on the internal procedure against Bianchini and would suddenly disappear, but there is still no certainty and this is only a very plausible hypothesis.
Together with Bianchini and Fabbri, three doctors of the Disciplinary Procedures Office were also investigated: Raffaele Zanella, Cristina Bortoluzzi and Tiziana Bortot. First the judge for the preliminary investigations of the Court of Belluno, Elisabetta Scolozzi, then the Venice Review, finally the Cassation rejected the request of the prosecutor Paolo Luca for a three-month suspension for Bianchini, Zanella and Bortoluzzi (for the first also from the profession ), dropping the hypothesis of the epidemic and, consequently, of aiding and abetting. If there was no first crime, because the epidemic was not the consequence of the professional attitude of the main suspect (visits without a mask) – given that it must be an event “capable of endangering public safety and determine the contagion of an indeterminate number of individuals “- not even the second was configured. Mathematical.
It would remain the forgery on the basis of a time card. There would be one day of difference between the return date indicated by Bianchini’s holiday in Thailand and the actual one. Could it be enough to ask for indictment?
.