Home » They denounce the judge before the JEM for favoring “Puerto Narco”

They denounce the judge before the JEM for favoring “Puerto Narco”

by admin
They denounce the judge before the JEM for favoring “Puerto Narco”
Puerto Fénix, with its logistics center on the banks of the Paraguay River in Mariano Roque Alonso, north of Asunción. One of the neighboring owners of the “Puerto Narco” is carrying out a long demarcation trial of more than 5 years.

Judge Karen Leticia González Orrego, of the civil and commercial jurisdiction of the Capital, was denounced before the Jury for the Prosecution of Magistrates (JEM) in the framework of a demarcation trial for a resolution in which the entire process goes back to the beginning, with which favors the position of the defendants, among which is the Puerto Fénix of Mariano Roque Alonso, on the Paraguay River, better known in shipping jargon as “Puerto Narco”.

The complaint was filed by the owner of farm No. 3,960, which is a piece of land that borders to the north of Puerto Fénix, in a lawsuit that has been going on for more than 5 years and in which the rigorous procedures prior to the demarcation sentence, among them the judicial measurement with the intervention of the same municipality, the INDERT and even the Attorney General of the Republic.

However, Judge González Orrego intends, according to the complainant Alberto Claudio Ramírez Alvarenga, “to change the essence and legal nature of this demarcation trial”, accusing that the magistrate violates legal certainty by promoting “procedural fraud”, because she argues that the The judge in a venal manner “recommends that the present contentious demarcation trial be considered as a voluntary judgment of measurement.”

Such an attitude of favoring the defendants in the demarcation trial, among them the “Puerto Narco”, resulted in the ruling of Judge González Orrego on May 24, where she ordered to roll back the demarcation trial and ignore the judicial measure carried out carried out, with all the firm and enforceable, precluded, recognized and consented actions passed under the authority of res judicata, “the challenged judge acting openly ignoring the law with notorious manifest partiality in favor of the adverse parties subverting due process and violating the guarantees constitutional rules of due process”.

See also  The Church is looking for members with musical ability worldwide

Wife of Bogarin Alfonso

The denounced judge is the wife of the member “with permission” of the JEM, Jorge Luis Bogarín Alfonso, who was designated as “significantly corrupt” by the Government of the United States with the sanction of loss of visa that also affected his spouse and their children. minors.

The sanctioned wife is precisely the judge challenged now before the Jury for the Trial of Magistrates, where her husband would continue to influence because he is well-known supported by the Chartist sector of the ANR and by sectors of the opposition, since the JEM has just dismissed the review of the removal of the late prosecutor Jorge López Lohman, who had been removed from office in November 2021 by decision of the Jury as a result of having accused a judicial official from San Pedro, a friend of Bogarín Alfonso, when he was still a member of the JEM and his vice president.

Mainly because of that decision, Bogarín Alfonso was sanctioned by the United States, accusing the American government of having interfered in judicial matters “for its own personal benefit”.

Bogarín Alfonso was also recently saved by the Red and Chartist caucus of the Chamber of Deputies when a request for impeachment was filed against him by a group of legislators, for his definitive separation from judicial control bodies such as the Council of the Magistracy and the JEM.

Prosecutor Jorge López Lohman passed away in May 2022 and to this day he has not received justice in Paraguay. He only echoed his actions in a decision of the United States Government, which declared Bogarín Alfonso corrupt, extending the sanction of loss of visa to his judge wife and his children.

See also  Ecuador promotes regional discussion on access to safe surgeries

It is the same magistrate who is now accused of a violation of the Law, arbitrarily taking back a demarcation trial at the beginning of the process itself, despite the fact that she herself had been directing the trial, thus favoring the defendants, according to the complaint by Alberto Ramírez Alvarenga. , with residence in the city of Hernandarias, Alto Paraná, and owner of the land bordering Puerto Fénix, the “Puerto Narco” so called by the navigators of the Paraguay River, because it would be used by drug traffickers to secretly embark export containers , drugs prohibited to neighboring and overseas countries, as was extensively documented in the media.

One of the directors of the owning company of Puerto Fénix, Puertos y Estibajes SA, is Pablo Livieres Guggiari, who in turn heads the legal firm Livieres Guggiari, which also leads court cases involving the “Boss” Horacio Cartes . . . .

The intention of HC’s lawyers would be to avoid that with the demarcation and measurement in Puerto Fénix, or “Puerto Narco”, irregularities in the titles of the properties of the place and in the adjoining lands where the port of Caacupemí is also located. San Francisco SA, and in which the state patrimony would also be affected, as there are possible public lands passed expressly into the hands of the private sector without any compensation for the Paraguayan State.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy