issuing time:
An article on the French investigative media “Mediapart” website on July 15, 2021, entitled “Wuhan, a laboratory legend covered by Chinese authorities for a year and a half” stated that since Sars-CoV-2 was officially announced in Wuhan, Beijing The authorities have never stopped lying. Every month, there are new discoveries of the regime’s massive deception. (Note: This article uses Sars-CoV-2 as the coronavirus Covid-19)
This article by Mediapart first questioned the inaccuracy of China’s official death toll from coronary pneumonia. The article said that although the latest population report released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China (May 2021) did list the number of living people in 2020 (1.411 billion Chinese), it did not mention the number of deaths. That is because the authorities do not want to compare with the figures of previous years. Therefore, we cannot measure the damage caused by the coronavirus Covid-19 to the Chinese.
The article went on to say: And this lie made through “omissions” forces us to be satisfied with the official assessment of the coronavirus pandemic in China: as of the end of December 2020, there were 93,000 infected people and 4,743 dead, namely It accounts for 0.32% of the 1.4 million deaths recorded in the world over the same period. On this basis, the number of deaths per million inhabitants of the country hardly exceeds 3, while in Belgium, the most severely affected country in the world, the death rate per million is 1,436. The article said, then use this “Orwellian” calculation method to end a long list of deceptions and lies, and here is a chronological order”:
December 31, 2019
This is the official date to confirm the existence of a virus that will soon be named Sars-CoV-2 in Wuhan. The first confirmed case was the case of a female vendor at a seafood market in Wuhan discovered on December 16, 2019. Between these two dates, Ai Fen, director of the emergency department of Wuhan Central Hospital, passed this information to some colleagues on the social network WeChat (including ophthalmologist Li Wenliang). Then she was rejected by the security service. According to reports, there may be at least seven doctors also targeted by the authorities.
As for whether the coronavirus had been circulating in Wuhan before December 2019? This hypothesis can be confirmed by obtaining personal health data of residents, especially the analysis of blood banks (as done by the Pasteur Institute in France), but these data are not accessible to the outside world.
Previously, Chinese scientists had put forward this hypothesis on social networks, but these remarks were subsequently censored and deleted. According to “Mediapart”, in the international security expert circle established after the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, there was a Chinese expert close to the ruling class. This person briefly stated on the exchange forum: As early as September 2019, There is a coronavirus (Covid-19) in Wuhan. But he did not say the details.
January 9, 2020
After hesitating for a few days, the Chinese authorities first announced the existence of the coronavirus in Wuhan on this day. Then, this virus was named “2019-nCov”. Starting from mid-January 2020, some institutions and laboratories around the world will obtain their genetic sequences from the Chinese health department. This is one of the few transparent gestures made by the regime to its foreign interlocutors. Two weeks later, after a month of wait and see, under the order of President Xi Jinping, universal containment measures and large-scale screenings were implemented in Wuhan.
January 31, 2020
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the disease a public health emergency of international concern. China Caixin.com (founder Hu Shuli enjoys some freedom of movement due to his political connections) published an interview with ophthalmologist Li Wenliang. Shortly before that, Li Wenliang was summoned by the police for mentioning the existence of severe lung disease in Wuhan on WeChat. The whistleblower died of coronavirus pneumonia 7 days after being interviewed. Subsequently, Caixin.com gave the right to speak to Li Wenliang’s colleagues, who all condemned the incompetence of the unit management and party branch secretary and did not anticipate risks.
February 3, 2020
Experts from Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) mentioned the existence of a virus called RaTG13 (96.2% similar to Sars-CoV-2) in the journal Nature. Four months later, the management of the institute clarified that this pathogen was discovered under a different name (Ra4991) as early as 2016. We have no way of knowing what research (experts at the Wuhan Institute of Toxicology) has done on the molecular adaptability of the virus during this period, especially the research on the protein that enhances its penetration into human lung cells.
However, starting from the autumn of 2019, the archive information in the database of Wuhan Institute of Virology has been blocked and cannot be accessed. The traces of these archives have also been carefully concealed. The collective investigation of the International Interdisciplinary Independent Investigation of the Origin of Coronavirus (DRASTIC) proves this point. They are trying to dig into the hypothesis of the laboratory accident.
February 7, 2020
China’s Xinhua News Agency reported that researchers from South China Agricultural University announced that they found that Sars-CoV-2 (coronavirus Covid-19) has a 99% similarity to the genome sequence of a virus found in pangolins. This small scaly animal that the Chinese love to eat was later referred to as an intermediate link in the process of infection from bats to humans. This theory (now rejected by the Western scientific community) allows Chinese leaders to replace any other assumptions with an easily acceptable “truth”.
However, the World Health Organization itself admitted that the World Health Organization’s “Discovery Project” project collected thousands of samples from dozens of wild and domestic animals in Southeast Asia, but did not find any evidence to verify the “animal intermediate host” hypothesis. As long as no intermediate host is found, in a strict sense, the theory of animal origin is still only one of the hypotheses.
February 2020
Scholars Xiao Botao and Xiao Lei (South China University of Technology) put forward the hypothesis of a laboratory accident, but they did not provide any evidence. The Chinese authorities immediately suppressed them and shut them up. However, their contributions can still be seen outside of China, especially in online archives. This action shows that those who do not adapt to the restrictions of the regime will resist the censorship system to some extent. Participants of the International Interdisciplinary Independent Investigation of Coronary Drug Traceability Group (DRASTIC) stated that they often receive information from China and choose to use this information as the basis for their investigation. Their responsibility is to thwart any attempt to spread rumors.
February 29, 2020
Caixin.com disclosed that several analytical laboratories in China received some samples from patients in Wuhan in December 2019. However, according to reports, the Hubei Provincial Health Commission ordered the destruction of these samples.
March 13, 2020
According to Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, on November 17, 2019, a citizen of Hubei Province (Wuhan) was found to be infected with Coronavirus Pneumonia (Sars-CoV-2).
June 2020
The interdisciplinary independent investigation of the origin of the coronavirus collectively published a summary of their preliminary findings, including: Wuhan University has been inspected by a special committee of the Ministry of Science and Technology since June 2019. The special committee severely criticized the lack of compartmentalization of the experimental area, imperfect laboratory safety rules, and insufficient student equipment.
The same assessment was also given to the 2013FY113500 (Bat Coronavirus Research) project of Wuhan Institute of Virology. The facilities used in the project, including air locks, autoclaves, chemical showers, autoclaves, wastewater treatment, etc., did not meet the required standards. Finally, the hazardous medical waste of the Wuhan Institute of Virology project has not been effectively treated. This observation resulted in the closure of a wastewater treatment plant on September 9, 2019, and the transfer of wastewater to a neighboring facility (Jiangxia Plant).
The interdisciplinary independent investigation of the coronavirus traceability group concluded: Our research has determined the situation at the time of the accident: In the research project of the bat pathogen virus closest to Sars-CoV-2 (coronavirus Covid-19), the sample or Improper handling of specimens. At this time, the laboratories participating in the bat coronavirus research (2013FY113500 project) had safety issues.
June to November 2020
After the pangolin legend, another theory emerged: After the workers employed in cold storage (in Qingdao and Tianjin) were infected, the virus was introduced to China through frozen food. The authorities have organized large-scale imported food screening activities, including Brazilian frozen meat, Argentine pork, Indian fish… The purpose is to prove that even if the coronavirus is first discovered on Chinese soil, it may come from other places. This is a repetitive rhetoric deliberately created by the authorities. In order to spread this rhetoric, some Chinese agencies used social networks to operate and created a fake expert named Larry Romanoff (Larry Romanoff). At the same time, hundreds of fake articles are spread out. For example, the Canadian website Globalresearch.ca is one of the spread channels.
November 2020
The head of the Wuhan Institute of Virology once again stated in the “Nature” that in addition to RaTG13 (virus), they also collected 8 other species related to Sars-CoV-2 (Covid-19) in their activities in Yunnan. Coronavirus. The genetic sequences of these viruses will finally be announced in May 2021.
However, if you read the three papers written between 2014 and 2019 (which may have been quietly passed by the judges of the examination committee to the interdisciplinary independent investigation of the origin of the coronavirus), you will find that at least one virus is present in the Wuhan Institute of Virology WIV Inside the freezer, it has not been announced.
At the same time, in Wuhan, they affirmed that they no longer have all the samples that were studied between 2016 and 2020. In fact, the Chinese authorities have not clearly stated the number and nature of the coronaviruses collected from bats in Yunnan mining areas before 2019 and then obtained in Wuhan for research. This can be seen from the initial statement about the virus. (For details, see “Les silences coupables de la Chine” in “China’s Guilty Silence”, author François Bougon). The same situation can also be seen in experiments on these viruses and their viral gene sequences.
January 2021
Thirteen experts commissioned by the World Health Organization and led by Peter Ben Embarek came to Wuhan. They are here to build a report on the disease, but there is no room to collect data for their research.
May 23, 2021
The Wall Street Journal reported that as early as November 2019, three scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalized with symptoms consistent with Sars-CoV-2 (coronary pneumonia) and seasonal infections. Two months ago, the Wuhan Institute of Virology reiterated in a press release that before December 30, 2019, none of its 590 employees had been exposed to the virus.
.