[Epoch Times, April 22, 2022]Shanghai announced on April 20 that Jinshan District and Chongming District will achieve the goal of clearing the society, confirming the rumors that Shanghai will forcibly create an inflection point of the epidemic previously disclosed by Reuters. With the tactical adjustment of Shanghai’s new crown prevention and control, in the past few days, Shanghai’s epidemic figures are being methodically and meticulously implementing the official narrowing strategy.
What makes the outside world notice is that from April 18 to April 21, Shanghai officials suddenly announced the death toll of the new crown in this round of epidemic for four consecutive days, namely 3, 7, 7 and 8 cases, totaling 25 cases, the number of deaths in four days fluctuated in single digits, and the number of newly infected people in four days, according to the official statement, is “continuous decline”.
The curve of the number of people infected in this wave of the epidemic in Shanghai is very similar to the curve of the fifth wave of the outbreak in Hong Kong. The death toll in Hong Kong is already around 9,000. Obviously, the virus entrenched in Shanghai is very face-saving and interesting, and the fatality rate almost negligible.
Earlier, the CCP basically arranged it like this. It has been more than a month since the outbreak of the epidemic in Shanghai, and there has not been a single death case during the rising period. When the “inflection point” strategy was determined to be implemented, deaths followed. Obviously, this is part of the victory of the CCP’s planned campaign. Someone must die to enhance the authenticity of the script. It cannot be like an anti-Japanese drama. Moreover, the official announcement has claimed more than once that the epidemic in Shanghai is worse than the epidemic in Wuhan in 2020. After all, more than 4,000 people died in Wuhan, and no one in Shanghai died. Isn’t it shooting itself in the foot?
Therefore, Shanghai must have dead people. To put it bluntly, Shanghai’s announcement of new crown deaths is political, and the outside world can see its five political narratives and logic.
1. Self-certify that “clearing” is justified, and make political patches
One epidemic, two routes, and many struggles. The Wuhan model was replicated in Ruili, Xi’an, and now Shanghai, mostly for the CCP’s political purpose of advocating the victory of institutional battles. Before the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the game between Shanghai’s precise prevention and control strategy and Beijing’s dynamic clearing was additionally given more symbolic meaning of power struggle.
Deutsche Welle reported that Chinese independent scholars pointed out in an interview that Xi Jinping’s “zero policy” was endowed with the connotation of class struggle.
The zero-clearing policy has become the political capital of the Xi administration, and its marginal political gains are exerting force in the 20 major power battles. Once denied or shaken, the consequences will be quite serious and will bring instability to Xi Jinping’s re-election. Xinhuanet has published a series of political articles that adhere to the position of dynamic clearing for the past few days, and strongly deny the view that Omikron is a big flu, emphasizing the seriousness and harm of Omikron, especially for the elderly. traumatic force.
In such a political context, the new crown epidemic, if it does not cooperate with the performance of the death plot, some are too self-justifying, and it is very easy to make the theory of clearing and zeroing become pseudoscience, and it is inevitable to be attacked. In order to “clear” it is reasonable, Shanghai must announce the death cases of the new crown epidemic in a timely manner, which can be regarded as a political patch.
2. “Coexisting with the virus” to start the Cold War
“Coexisting with the virus” in this wave of political wrestling in the epidemic has always failed to be well-killed by the authorities. In addition to Zhang Wenhong’s voices from time to time to secretly criticize the zero-clearing policy, there will be strong resistance constantly. The CCP military doctor Miao Xiaohui put on a duel-style call a few days ago, naming Wu Zunyou and Liang Wannian, criticizing and opposing the zero-clearing policy.
Not to be outdone, Wu Zunyou posted that he would fight the virus for a long time, and emphasized that dynamic clearing does not mean closing the city, because letting “coexist with the virus” forced the city to be closed, which is also a response to Miao Xiaohui.
What is intriguing is Zhong Nanshan’s reversal and defections. The fact that Zhong Nanshan also betrayed his position of clearing up must not mean that the situation of the line struggle is severe. On April 6, Zhong Nanshan and Guan Weijie, an associate researcher at the State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, jointly published an article entitled “China’s Reopening Strategy in the Future New Crown Era” in the Chinese English academic journal “National Science and Technology Review”, which rarely pointed out that “short-term Continue to clear it dynamically, and consider gradually opening it up for a long time.” This is obviously contradicting the Xi administration.
Zhong Nanshan’s gourd sells exactly what medicine, perhaps Academician Zhong knows best in his heart. Recently, the CCP’s medical and health care industry has been undergoing a series of major events. On April 17, Yu Lumin, director of the Beijing Health and Health Commission, was sacked, and was accused of nucleic acid commissions. In the past few days, Lianhua Qingwen and Yiling Pharmaceutical have been undermined by the media and the Internet, and Zhong Nanshan has naturally been roasted on the fire. During the closure of Shanghai, vegetables and rations were difficult to get into households, but Lotus Qingwen was as easy as the palm of your hand.
Is Zhong Nanshan’s naysaying out of a sudden conscience discovery, or is he cutting himself and Lianhua Qingwen?
On April 19, “People’s Daily” and “Qiushi” published high-profile articles in support of the dynamic clearing policy, emphasizing that “the current epidemic prevention and control in Shanghai is at a critical stage, and only by unswervingly implementing the general policy of ‘dynamic clearing'” “The execution of the decisive battle” will resolutely win the tough battle of epidemic prevention and control.
The article repeats again that “The Omicron variant is by no means a ‘big flu’, and its harm must not be underestimated.” The article also rarely mentions that “old people with underlying diseases are at risk of severe illness once superimposed on viral infection.” “The case fatality rate for the elderly and other vulnerable populations is much higher than expected.”
The article introduced the concept of “underlying disease” when talking about the mortality rate of the new crown. It should be said that for a long time, “not dying from the new crown does not count as death” has become the CCP’s evil way to whitewash the efficacy of the zero-clearing policy. Has the CCP started to improve? Has the cause of death been revealed?
3. Play the “international standard” card to enhance deceit
When the CCP announced the death cases of the new crown in Shanghai, it rarely announced the direct cause of death. According to the CCP’s public information, from April 17 to 19, 17 new deaths were reported in Shanghai, 2 people under the age of 60, and the rest were elderly, and the direct causes of death were all caused by underlying diseases such as malignant tumors and uremia.
Several CCP media reported that the average age of the eight deaths in Shanghai on April 20 was 77.5 years old, and the oldest was 93 years old. The direct causes of death of the 8 new crown-positive patients were caused by advanced malignant tumors, severe cardiovascular diseases, neurological diseases, uremia and other underlying diseases, and they died after rescue efforts were ineffective.
Sun Chunlan emphasized when conducting research and guidance in Shanghai from April 19th to 20th, “Strengthen the treatment and care of severe and critically ill patients, and do everything possible to reduce the fatality rate.”
As we all know, the CCP tried its best to cover up the number of deaths in the Wuhan epidemic in 2020. Not only those who died of complications were not counted, but those who died directly from the new crown were not counted at all. Countless Wuhan people died of the new crown, but the hospitals did not open them at all. prove. Internationally, both direct and indirect deaths from the new crown virus are counted in the new crown death case data, which has always been a pretext for the CCP to criticize and slander Western epidemic prevention policies.
The CCP rarely admits that the patient died directly from the underlying disease. On the surface, it is in line with international standards, but in fact it is still a sensational link in its political script. On the one hand, it is implying that China has not concealed the truth, and it has been published according to the facts, which is consistent with the international standard and statistical caliber of death cases, which enhances deceit; Human harm, the CCP claimed that 19% of the infected people in Shanghai were over 60 years old, seeking support and building a scientific logic chain for its so-called “life first” zero-clearing policy.
The CCP official emphasized that among the 17 new crown deaths in Shanghai from the 18th to the 20th, only 2 people were vaccinated, and the rest were not vaccinated.
The official also announced that as of now, the vaccination rate of 60-year-olds in Shanghai is 62%, and the booster vaccination rate is 38%. The conclusion is: Generally speaking, the vaccination rate is low.
The CCP also took out data from Hong Kong and said that the fatality rate of Hong Kong patients who were not vaccinated accounted for 3.2%, and the fatality rates of one injection, two injections and three injections were: 0.96%/0.14%/0.03%. Among the deaths, the median age At age 86, 90% of mortality rates have chronic underlying diseases. People over 60 have a 252 times higher risk of death than those under 30.
The CCP’s own data on fatalities in Hong Kong concealed the fact that Hong Kong’s case fatality rate is high, as well as the fact that Hong Kong’s population is aging and vaccination rates are comparable to Shanghai. Nearly 10,000 people died of illness in Hong Kong, and only 25 in Shanghai. Who can believe this data? At present, the cumulative number of infected people in Shanghai has reached 500,000. If only 25 people really died, is it necessary to clear the city? Is it necessary to force the whole population to be vaccinated?
One of the purposes of the CCP’s announcement of the death cases in Shanghai is precisely to exert political pressure on the national vaccine. Xinhua News Agency issued an article on April 21, “The latest scientific research finds that vaccination with 3 doses of domestic inactivated vaccine can significantly reduce the severity of the disease in people infected with Omicron.”
The article said that 430 positive samples were studied by researchers from Tianjin First Central Hospital, Changping National Laboratory, Peking University Biomedical Frontier Innovation Center, and Nankai University’s Institute of Immunology, saying that “inactivated vaccine vaccination may pass Ways to induce inflammatory outcomes and shorten the course of COVID-19.”
Obviously, the CCP is laying the groundwork for the promotion of the national strengthening injection, but is it really effective? Earlier, a recording of a medical doctor and a legal person was circulated on the Internet. The medical doctor said that “viruses of unknown origin cannot be developed and produced according to the “Vaccine Management Law”. The doctor said that he has three immediate family members, He passed away after being vaccinated, and bluntly stated that the new crown vaccine has many other poisons besides the virus itself. “We all know that when experimental animals die, who told you? No one told you, and experts said it was safe.”
The MD was very angry and said, “You can’t do it once, you can’t do it twice, you can’t do it twice, you can’t do it three times, you can’t do it three times, you can do it four times. We’re so angry that our lungs are going to explode… And why do they keep getting vaccinated?”
We can find the answer to the question of the medical doctor from the recording of Huang Wansheng’s conversation with his friends some time ago. Huang said that some bullshit group companies are making money from nucleic acids and vaccines.
The death of Cao Xiaobin, an executive of Kexing Corporation, was reported on the Internet. Netizens combined with Yu Lu Min to fall, speculating that there would be a storm in the medical and health sector. At this time, Xinhua News Agency emphasized the need for stronger injections. fierce.
5. Dying in a city closure and man-made disaster is still not considered death
The 25 deaths of infected people in Shanghai released by the CCP seem to be objective and fair, but in fact, avoid the important ones. The Wall Street Journal and the British BBC disclosed that dozens of deceased people in the Shanghai Donghai elderly apartment were officially declared that they did not die because of the new crown virus, but because of their own diseases. Currently on the mainland, discussing their deaths has become off-limits.
The CCP did not mention the secondary disaster of death due to city closures, difficulty in seeking medical treatment, lack of food and starvation. The death of a nurse in Shanghai, the death of Lang Xianping’s mother, the death of Shu Qun, the widow of Zhu Jian’er, the composer of “Sing a Folk Song for the Party”, the death of Fudan professor Yu Huizhong and Shanghai Jiaotong University professor calligrapher Wu Zhongnan, the death of violinist Chen Shunping, etc. There are countless unknown ordinary people who jumped off the building, died of starvation, children died in isolation, etc. These people who died under the iron fist of the CCP’s socialist period when it concentrated its efforts on major events are still not considered dead.
Zhao Lijian said: “During the epidemic, if you live in China, you can just have fun.” A few years ago, political ruffian He Zuoxiu once commented on the CCP’s mine disaster: “Who told you that you were unfortunately born in China.”
He and Zhao are the best disaster spokespersons in the CCP’s demon class, and only the CCP system can cultivate such people.
The Epoch Times premieres
Responsible editor: Zhu Ying